Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2020-05-15 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 global score. The LG Velvet construction is newer, but a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than Google Nexus 6P. Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better screen pixels density.
The LG Velvet has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a little better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The LG Velvet has improved battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh. LG Velvet captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos.
The LG Velvet not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.