Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| 2020-05-15 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than the LG V30's general score of 79.1. LG Velvet is a notably newer cellphone than the LG V30, although it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V30 and LG Velvet have quite similar processing units, and although the LG V30 has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V30 counts with a bit sharper display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a higher screen density. The LG Velvet shoots better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
LG Velvet has more storage for games and applications than LG V30, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The LG Velvet counts with better battery life than LG V30, because it has a 30 percent more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG Velvet is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.