Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 score. LG Velvet's construction is newer, just a little thinner and a little lighter than the LG V50 ThinQ. LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than LG Velvet. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG Velvet captures much better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also counts with a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ's storage capacity for apps and games is very similar to the LG Velvet one, they have a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and equal 128 GB internal memory. The LG Velvet features just a bit better battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
The LG Velvet is a little more expensive than LG V50 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.