Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's score of 76.4. LG Velvet's design is much newer and a lot thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, but it is also just a little heavier. Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better performance than LG Velvet, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels amount in each inch of screen. LG Velvet has a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage.
LG Velvet features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh. The LG Velvet takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Velvet also has a way more MP camera, higher video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations.
The LG Velvet is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.