Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 87.1 score against 77.9. The LG Velvet construction is notably newer and noticeably thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, although it is a bit heavier. The Motorola DROID Turbo features just a little better performance than LG Velvet, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 4 less processing cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a slightly higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. LG Velvet counts with a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG Velvet also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera, a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and faster 30 frames per second video frame rate.
LG Velvet features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet has a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG Velvet is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.