Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 overall score. LG Velvet's body has the same weight and thickness than the Motorola Edge 50. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels.
The LG Velvet has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 features just a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a much larger camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a more mega-pixels back camera.
LG Velvet features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 has greater battery life than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.