Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's general score of 79.7. Even though LG Velvet and Motorola Moto G Stylus were released with only 1 months difference, LG Velvet is just a little bit lighter and thinner. LG Velvet has a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG Velvet has a little more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a little bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the same video frame rate, a same size sensor and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has an 8 percent larger battery capacity.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.