Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. LG Velvet is a newer device than the Moto Z4, although it is a little heavier and just a bit thicker. The LG Velvet counts with a little more vivid display than Moto Z4, because although it has a little inferior amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
LG Velvet has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM memory.
The LG Velvet features greater battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. The Moto Z4 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality, a 0.5 inches camera sensor and a camera with a 48 megapixels, the Moto Z4 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the LG Velvet is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.