Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's general score of 79.9. The LG Velvet is an older phone than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it's just a bit lighter and a little thinner anyway. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little better processing power than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3216px and a greater pixels count in each inch of display. OPPO Find X3 Pro captures a little bit better photos and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, higher video frame rate and a more MP back camera.
The LG Velvet has much more storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.