Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy A32's global score of 84.7. LG Velvet is a thinner and lighter phone than the Galaxy A32, even when both were released with only a couple months difference. The LG Velvet counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG Velvet features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a bit larger screen and a greater pixels quantity per display inch. LG Velvet features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A32, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size aperture and the same resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy A32 has longer battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.