Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A60's global score of 82.3. LG Velvet is a a bit heavier phone than Galaxy A60, but both of them have the same thickness. Samsung Galaxy A60 and LG Velvet have very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A60 has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG Velvet has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A60, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A60. Both have 8 processing cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
LG Velvet has better battery lifetime than Galaxy A60, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. The LG Velvet captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.