Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is slightly better than the LG Velvet, having a score of 90.5 against 87.1. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy A90 5G is a just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the LG Velvet. The Galaxy A90 5G has a little faster CPU than LG Velvet. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy A90 5G features a display that is very similar to LG Velvet's display, although the Galaxy A90 5G has a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit smaller screen. Galaxy A90 5G has a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in low-light situations, they both have a same resolution camera, a 0.5 inches sensor, the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
The LG Velvet counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a bit longer battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.