Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-15 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's score of 81. LG Velvet's design is extremely newer and just a bit lighter, but thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro. The LG Velvet has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2460px resolution, a quite larger screen and a little bit greater pixel density.
LG Velvet counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The LG Velvet has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
LG Velvet has a lot better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much more megapixels camera, a bigger camera aperture and a lot better video resolution. LG Velvet counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has an 8% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.