Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s is slightly better than the LG Velvet, getting a general score of 88 against 87.1. Although it's the best in this review, we must highlight that it's also somewhat heavier and thicker. The LG Velvet and the Galaxy M31s have similar CPUs, both have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy M31s features a display that's very similar to the display in LG Velvet, because although the Galaxy M31s has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density. The LG Velvet has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M31s has a very superior battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 40 percent more battery capacity. Galaxy M31s counts with a little bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Galaxy M31s also has a way more MP back camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.