Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a general score of 87.1 against 78.8. Even being the best we are comparing here, LG Velvet's body is older, a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than the vivo X60 Pro. Vivo X60 Pro features a little more vivid screen than LG Velvet, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2376 resolution and a quite smaller display, they both have the same count of pixels per inch in the display.
LG Velvet has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The LG Velvet counts with a bit better battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 2% more battery capacity. The vivo X60 Pro captures slightly better videos and photos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, a F1.8 aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and the same resolution back camera, the vivo X60 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.