Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's general score of 85.5. The LG Velvet design weights the same than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but it's somewhat thinner. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a slightly better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2246px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. LG Velvet has a slightly better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor, a larger aperture and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The LG Velvet features just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.