Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-05-26 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30 is much better than LG X venture, with a overall score of 79.1 against 71.7. The LG V30 body is just a bit lighter and a lot thinner than the LG X venture, even when both were released only a couple months apart. The LG V30 counts with a little more vivid screen than LG X venture, because it has a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a better pixels density and a larger screen.
LG V30 has a bit more powerful CPU than LG X venture, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30 also has more RAM memory. The LG V30 has a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than LG X venture, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30 also has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG X venture has better battery life than LG V30, because it has a 24% bigger battery size. The LG V30 features a much better camera than LG X venture, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the LG V30 also has a way better (4K) video quality and a way larger camera aperture.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG X venture. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get LG X venture, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.