Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-05-26 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is better than LG X venture's 71.7 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Although the LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit heavier than the LG X venture, it's thinner and also newer.
LG V50 ThinQ has a quite superior performance than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG X venture, because it has a bigger display, a greater pixels density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG X venture, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior camera than LG X venture, because although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot larger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
The LG X venture counts with a bit better battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 2 percent larger battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ is a lot more expensive than the LG X venture, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.