Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Mystic indigo |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 110.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is better than the LG X venture, getting a 79.7 score against 71.7. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Motorola Moto G Stylus has older 11 version and LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Motorola Moto G Stylus body is notably newer and a little thinner, but also heavier than the LG X venture.
Moto G Stylus counts with a display that's very similar to LG X venture's display, because although the Moto G Stylus has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2300 resolution and a larger display. Moto G Stylus features a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG X venture, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The Moto G Stylus features a little bit better performance than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto G Stylus also has a higher amount of RAM. Moto G Stylus features a greater camera than LG X venture, because it has a camera with lot more mega pixels, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a way bigger diafragm aperture for better captures in low-light situations.
LG X venture counts with a bit better battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG X venture. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Moto G Stylus, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG X venture, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.