Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 is much better than LG X venture, with an 86.5 score against 71.7. Samsung Galaxy M31's construction is way newer and a little bit thinner, but also heavier than LG X venture. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M31 has 11 version and LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Galaxy M31 has a little better hardware performance than LG X venture, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy M31 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy M31 counts with a little bit better screen than LG X venture, because although it has a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
LG X venture counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M31, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy M31 features a way better battery lifetime than LG X venture, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4100mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a way better camera than LG X venture, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video, a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.