Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-05-26 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is way better than the LG X venture, getting an 87.1 score against 71.7. Galaxy Note9's body is newer and just a bit thinner, but also heavier than LG X venture. Galaxy Note9 has a slightly better screen than LG X venture, because it has a quite greater pixels density, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a larger screen.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a better performing processor than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a better memory to store more apps and games than LG X venture, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
LG X venture counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Galaxy Note9 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG X venture, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a lot larger aperture for better images in poorly lited situations.
Although Galaxy Note9 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG X venture. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the LG X venture, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.