Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ is better than LG X venture, with a score of 79.3 against 71.7. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version and LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Galaxy S6 edge+ body is way thinner and just a little bit lighter than LG X venture, although it was released around 22 months before.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a sharper display than LG X venture, because it has a quite bigger display, a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. The LG X venture has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG X venture has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ captures better pictures and videos than LG X venture, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 16 megapixels, the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a much higher (4K) video quality.
The LG X venture has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG X venture. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S6 edge+, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG X venture, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.