Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 198 hours standby time 8.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is much better than Micromax Canvas Selfie, with a general score of 80 against 57. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Micromax Canvas Selfie, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a larger amount of RAM.
The Micromax Canvas Selfie counts with a little bit better display than Google Pixel 3, although it has a much lower resolution of 1280 x 720px, a much lower pixels density and a bit smaller screen. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Micromax Canvas Selfie, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 3 counts with greater battery duration than Micromax Canvas Selfie, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh. The Google Pixel 3 features a greater camera than Micromax Canvas Selfie, because although it has a lesser mega pixels back camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Micromax Canvas Selfie, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.