Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2015-10-29 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 544 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with an 84.7 score against 75.4. Samsung Galaxy A32 is a heavier phone than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but both of them have the same thickness. Galaxy A32's processor is very similar to Motorola DROID Turbo 2's processor, and although the Galaxy A32 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A32 has longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A32 shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.