Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-27 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 135.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a overall score of 79.7 against 74.8. Both devices we are comparing use Android operating system, but Moto G Stylus has a more recent 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has Android 5.1 version, giving lots of additional features and improved performance. Moto G Stylus's design has the same thickness than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but it is heavier.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a greater number of 2000 MHz cores and more RAM. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Moto G Stylus features a superior camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G Stylus also has a much better resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Stylus, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto G Stylus counts with just a little better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3760mAh.
Although Motorola Moto G Stylus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.