Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having a score of 84.5 against 80.9. The iPhone XS Max is a older and a little heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but Apple made it just a little bit thinner anyway. The iPhone XS Max counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and 5 more cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra and the iPhone XS Max have similar screens, because although the iPhone XS Max has a quite smaller screen and much lower brightness, it also counts with a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a just a bit better pixels count per inch of screen. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a lot higher resolution camera.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.