Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 overall score. The Galaxy A71 5G body is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, even though it was released 2 years before. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12.
Galaxy A71 5G has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G. Both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the same quantity of pixels per screen inch and a screen with the same size.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.