Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little bit better than the Google Pixel XL, having an 87.1 score against 81.3. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction has the same thickness than the Google Pixel XL, but it is heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a much lower display pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Google Pixel XL has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less CPU cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor, better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a camera with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light environments.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.