Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than LG V20's 77 general score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly newer cellphone than LG V20, although it's thicker and heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better display than LG V20, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a larger display.
LG V20 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower number of cores and 8 GB lesser RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than LG V20, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better video frame rate, a way more MP back-facing camera, a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior battery life than LG V20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.