Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Aurora black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ, getting an 87.1 score against 83.7. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is newer than LG V50 ThinQ, it is just a bit heavier and a little thicker. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little more vivid screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse pixels quantity per inch of screen and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little larger display. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little bit more storage for games and applications than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a much larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a little better battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.