Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, with a score of 87.1 against 76.4. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is way newer and notably thinner, but also heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Motorola Droid Turbo features a little sharper display than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixels count per screen inch.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a greater camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and higher video frame rates.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 480 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.