Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a general score of 87.1 against 77.9. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is notably newer and much thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it is heavier.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less processing cores , it also counts with a GPU. Motorola DROID Turbo features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and higher video frame rates.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.