Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus's score of 79.7. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is much newer and a little thinner, but just a little bit heavier than Moto G Stylus. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version, so it gives some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera with a better 50 mega pixels resolution, better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a little bit longer battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.