Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy A12, with an 87.1 score against 80.3. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Galaxy A12 has Android 10 version, providing you a lot of extra features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is much newer, a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Galaxy A12.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bit larger display and a greater pixel density. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A12, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy A12 has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a larger aperture, a more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot higher video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with just a little better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.