Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32, getting an 87.1 score against 84.7. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is a lot newer, a bit lighter and a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A32. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 OS, and Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a greater pixels number in each display inch and a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy A32 has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera with more mega pixels, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and faster video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A32 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.