Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A7 (2018)'s general score of 84.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is extremely newer than Galaxy A7 (2018)'s, although it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a just a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a way better 3840x2160 video definition, a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.