Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 general score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. Although the Galaxy A71 5G is older than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's body is just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter screen than Galaxy A71 5G. Both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a same size screen and the same pixels density. The Galaxy A71 5G has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot lower 50 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and Galaxy A71 5G both count with quite similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.