Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy A8 Star's 82.1 overall score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is way newer, but just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A8 Star. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy A8 Star has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better display than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit bigger display and a quite greater screen pixel density.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot more megapixels back camera, a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations, higher video frame rate and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.