Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy C9 Pro's overall score of 81. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is incredibly newer, but much thicker and just a little bit heavier than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the older 14 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger display, a just a little higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images, a way higher video definition and a much more megapixels camera in the back. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.