Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little bit better than Galaxy M30s, with a score of 87.1 against 83.3. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Galaxy M30s has Android 11 version, providing you a lot of extra features and performance tweaks. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit heavier than Galaxy M30s, it's a bit thinner and also way newer.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper screen than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s features a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy M30s features better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little bit better camera than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher video frame rate, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.