Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than the Galaxy M31, having an 87.1 score against 86.5. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a little bit heavier than Galaxy M31, it's a bit thinner and a lot newer. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Galaxy M31 has Android 11, so it gives lots of additional features and optimized performance.
Galaxy M31 features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a way brighter screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy M31 has greater battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a lower video quality and a back camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a much larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.