Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31s has an overall score of 88, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's global score of 87.1. Galaxy M31s is a notably older, just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy M31s has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has a quite worse number of pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a way lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor and a larger camera aperture. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy M31s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy M31s counts with greater battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.