Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, with an 87.1 score against 87.1. Although it's the best in this comparison, the Galaxy Note9 is a noticeably older, just a little heavier and just a little thicker device than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
Galaxy Note9 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a back camera with way more MP and a much larger sensor taking much better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.