Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black and White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Both of these phones work with the same Android 14 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is lighter but notably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and both were released only a couple months apart.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a bit more pixels per screen inch, a much brighter screen, a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, and they both have the same sensor size and a same resolution camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has as much memory for games and applications as the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has improved battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.