Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, having an 87.1 score against 76.4. These devices work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is notably newer than Xiaomi Mi 5s, it's way heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a quite worse pixels number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a really brighter display, a bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Xiaomi Mi 5s features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 lesser cores (but faster) and less RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster video frame rates, a larger aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments, a camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a really longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.