Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's 85.5 score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a way newer and a bit thinner device than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but it's also a little heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little bit lower amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, much more brightness and a little bit larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger aperture to take better captures in low-light environments, a way larger camera sensor shooting way higher quality photos and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a slightly better memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.