Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50, getting a score of 84.2 against 81.2. The Apple iPhone XS is an older device than the Motorola Edge 50, but it is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. IPhone XS has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 has a bit better display than iPhone XS, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with way more brightness, a larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels. The Motorola Edge 50 features a much bigger storage for applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 takes much better photos and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back and a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has an 88% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.