Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50, having a overall score of 82.9 against 81.2. Even though the Google Pixel 4 XL is better than the Motorola Edge 50, we must tell that it is also a way older, just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker device. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a quite lower 1220 x 2712px resolution and a little bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 features a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a lot bigger sensor capturing much better quality photos.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.