Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, getting a general score of 82.7 against 81.2. LG G8X ThinQ is a incredibly older, just a little thicker and just a little heavier phone than Motorola Edge 50. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 features a brighter display than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a bit higher screen pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 50 takes much clearer videos and photos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a camera in the back with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 counts with better battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.