Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Holographic white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is slightly better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 construction is notably newer, a little bit thinner and lighter than the LG Stylo 6. These devices have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 has a newer 14 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version.
LG Stylo 6 has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a more vivid screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a lot better camera than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera. The LG Stylo 6 has a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 50 features greater battery performance than LG Stylo 6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.